| |
| |
| List of abbreviations | |
| |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
| Corporations, conflicts and human rights | |
| |
| |
| |
| The rise of corporate social responsibility | |
| |
| |
| |
| Regulation at the domestic level | |
| |
| |
| |
| Criminal liability | |
| |
| |
| |
| Liability through civil courts | |
| |
| |
| |
| Non-mandatory mechanisms | |
| |
| |
| |
| International regulation | |
| |
| |
| |
| 'Soft-law' initiatives | |
| |
| |
| |
| The International Criminal Court | |
| |
| |
| |
| Some post-Rome developments | |
| |
| |
| |
| Central question | |
| |
| |
| |
| Method and structure | |
| |
| |
| |
| Criminal Responsibility and the Corporate Entity | |
| |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
| The criminology of international corporate crime | |
| |
| |
| |
| Conceptualising corporate crime | |
| |
| |
| |
| Corporate crime in international context | |
| |
| |
| |
| The morality paradigm and corporate liability | |
| |
| |
| |
| Can corporations be regarded as persons? | |
| |
| |
| |
| Moral agency and moral responsibility | |
| |
| |
| |
| Legal personhood and moral responsibility | |
| |
| |
| |
| Guilt and punishment of collectives | |
| |
| |
| |
| The moral guilt contention | |
| |
| |
| |
| Collective legal guilt and the position of the individual | |
| |
| |
| |
| Accountability, culpability and due process | |
| |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Corporate accountability � La Nuremberg | |
| |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Nuremberg 'collective criminality' model | |
| |
| |
| |
| The doctrine of conspiracy | |
| |
| |
| |
| The concept of criminal organizations | |
| |
| |
| |
| A missed opportunity vis-�-vis corporate accountability? | |
| |
| |
| |
| The Nuremberg prosecution of industrialists | |
| |
| |
| |
| An overview of domestic military trials | |
| |
| |
| |
| Synthesising the Nuremberg principles of individual criminal responsibility in relation to corporate officials | |
| |
| |
| |
| The implicit denunciation of corporations as accessories to Nazi crimes | |
| |
| |
| |
| The legacy of Nuremberg | |
| |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Collective criminality and the Rome Statute | |
| |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
| The 'common purpose' doctrine | |
| |
| |
| |
| Joint criminal enterprise: doctrinal overview | |
| |
| |
| |
| The elements of joint criminal enterprise as a mode of liability | |
| |
| |
| |
| Jurisprudential attempts at counteracting the drawbacks of the JCE doctrine | |
| |
| |
| |
| The customary law origins of JCE | |
| |
| |
| |
| The inherent complexities of extended JCE | |
| |
| |
| |
| Critical appraisal of the ad hoc tribunals' approach to JCE | |
| |
| |
| |
| The 'common purpose' concept in the Rome Statute | |
| |
| |
| |
| The divergent nature of Article 25(3)(d) RS | |
| |
| |
| |
| A redundant provision? | |
| |
| |
| |
| The concept of superior responsibility | |
| |
| |
| |
| Brief historical survey of the development of the doctrine | |
| |
| |
| |
| Superior responsibility under the Rome Statute | |
| |
| |
| |
| The components of superior responsibility as a mode of liability | |
| |
| |
| |
| The existence of a superior - subordinate relationship | |
| |
| |
| |
| The cognitive requirement for superior responsibility | |
| |
| |
| |
| Activities within the effective responsibility and control of superiors | |
| |
| |
| |
| The duty of superiors to act | |
| |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| The criminal liability of corporationswithin the Rome Statute framework | |
| |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
| The ambit of actus reus and mens rea in the Rome Statute | |
| |
| |
| |
| Acts and omissions | |
| |
| |
| |
The dolus directus facet of Article 30. RS | |
| |
| |
| |
| Dolus eventualis as a form of volition? | |
| |
| |
| |
| Culpa-type liability under the Rome Statute | |
| |
| |
| |
| Utilising the current Rome Statute provisions | |
| |
| |
| |
| Indirectly implicating MNCs on the basis of individual convictions | |
| |
| |
| |
| The notion of complicity as an avenue for corporate liability | |
| |
| |
| |
| Direct corporate criminal liability sui generis | |
| |
| |
| |
| The criminal responsibility of corporations 'in the draft' | |
| |
| |
| |
| Declarations of criminality | |
| |
| |
| |
| Liability along vicarious lines | |
| |
| |
| |
| Domestic approaches to corporate criminal liability | |
| |
| |
| |
| The principle of aggregation | |
| |
| |
| |
| Proactive and reactive fault | |
| |
| |
| |
| The corporate ethos approach | |
| |
| |
| |
| Constructive corporate fault | |
| |
| |
| |
| The constructive method and international crimes | |
| |
| |
| |
| Setting the subjective threshold of corporate liability | |
| |
| |
| |
| The dolus eventualis standard of corporate misconduct | |
| |
| |
| |
| Culpa as a benchmark for corporate criminal responsibility | |
| |
| |
| |
| A word on dolus specialis | |
| |
| |
| |
| The scope of the objective element | |
| |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Culpability beyond the confines of the corporate form | |
| |
| |
| |
| Introduction | |
| |
| |
| |
| Direct parent liability | |
| |
| |
| |
| The intrinsic protections of the corporate form | |
| |
| |
| |
| Justifying the attribution of criminal responsibility to parent companies | |
| |
| |
| |
| The criteria for ascribing direct liability to parent corporations | |
| |
| |
| |
| The duty to intervene | |
| |
| |
| |
| Authority | |
| |
| |
| |
| Awareness | |
| |
| |
| |
| The power to intervene | |
| |
| |
| |
| Control | |
| |
| |
| |
| Causality | |
| |
| |
| |
| Direct criminal responsibility and supply chain dynamics | |
| |
| |
| |
| The superior responsibility of corporate officials | |
| |
| |
| |
| Superior - subordinate relationships and the 'effective responsibility and control' test | |
| |
| |
| |
| The cognitive requirement and the corresponding failure to act | |
| |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Conclusion | |
| |
| |
| |
| Overview | |
| |
| |
| |
| Prospects along the regulatory continuum | |
| |
| |
| |
| The complementarity contention pertaining to 'inaction' and 'inability' | |
| |
| |
| |
| Alternatives to corporate criminal liability and the implications for the principle of complementarity | |
| |
| |
| |
| Non-criminal regulation - a viable option for the ICC? | |
| |
| |
| |
| The pitfalls of collective criminality | |
| |
| |
| |
| The imperative of aligning accountability with due process | |
| |
| |
| |
| Collective punishment: effects on the 'innocent' bystander? | |
| |
| |
| |
| Liability of MNCs in international criminal law: from aspiration to reality | |
| |
| |
| |
| Corporate accountability and the goals of international criminal justice | |
| |
| |
| |
| The 'problem' of plea bargaining | |
| |
| |
| |
| Deterrence, retribution and the expressive function of (international) criminal law | |
| |
| |
| Summary | |
| |
| |
| Samenvatting | |
| |
| |
| Selected legal provisions | |
| |
| |
| Bibliography | |
| |
| |
| Table of cases | |
| |
| |
| Table of UN and other documents | |
| |
| |
| Index | |
| |
| |
| Curriculum vitae | |